December 22nd, 2005

insane

(no subject)

Just call me Mister Grumpy-Ass.

Impromptu meeting today on architecture. GUIman and I are having head-butting arguments over some really weird shit. When I mention that "blocks get parsed into objects", he first wants a rigid definition of the object, then objects to the parsing. When I'm explaining the block structure advantages over the existing cobbled-together randomness, he objects to it as being unnecessary.

It's absolutely weird. He wants to describe everything in terms of UML, where I feel that UML is too cumbersome for some of the embedded real-time concepts. When I talk about abstraction of the communication between two units in the sense of an ISO/OSI network abstraction, he calls it too complex and feels it would take too much time, instead being in favor of a "data virtualization" layer. Which is exactly the same thing.

It seems like he's just objecting to what I'm bringing up because it's me bringing it up. It's frustrating.
insane

Quanto?

Brain gone, it go on vacation. Me stuck in meat-puppet typing. Brain say "so long" after meeting where brain run around like Snoop Dogg posse looking for cheap cigars.

Meat-puppet want cake. Brain say meat-puppet no get cake, but brain gone. Unfortunately cake gone too by time brain go. Now meat-puppet want booze.

Collapse )

Meat puppet laugh so hard him spill drink.

Meat puppet wonder why tax on condoms. Would hurt and poke holes.