Tom Ramcigam (magicmarmot) wrote,
Tom Ramcigam
magicmarmot

Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage

Okay. Regardless of whether you support gay marriage or not, is it really necessary to have a constitutional amendment to define the issue? Considering that there is not anywhere near a consensus on the issue, it is completely and utterly the current administration forcing the "we know better than you do" card, and that is absolutely the wrong reason to create an amendment.
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    This is supposed to be a trailer for a zombie movie with strippers. I'm oddly enchanted and repelled at the same time. This movie ain't no…

  • (no subject)

    Your call is very important to us. Please stay on the line while we assist other people whose calls are important to us as well. You may have to…

  • (no subject)

    Went to an animation festival tonight with avindair. It was an "art" animation festival, which resulted in a sort of epiphany. As a…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment