Tom Ramcigam (magicmarmot) wrote,
Tom Ramcigam

Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage

Okay. Regardless of whether you support gay marriage or not, is it really necessary to have a constitutional amendment to define the issue? Considering that there is not anywhere near a consensus on the issue, it is completely and utterly the current administration forcing the "we know better than you do" card, and that is absolutely the wrong reason to create an amendment.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment