Tom Ramcigam (magicmarmot) wrote,
Tom Ramcigam
magicmarmot

Jeez louise...

No, we do not allow the user to perform an edit on that data. For one, the user is operating on a copy of the data from the database, and not the database itself, and that will cause synchronization problems.

For another, you never requested that the user be able to edit the data. Simply expecting it and hoping for it is not the same as communicating a requirement.

If you need the user to be able to edit the data in the field, it can be done, but it will take some rather extensive processing in the database synchronization step that will take time to design and develop. And that will cause the release date to be delayed, possibly by months.

Now how much did you really need that feature again?
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    It finally happened. It had to, really. I was in the bottom two cut from LJ-Idol this week. I made it to the top 50, from some rather larger…

  • Mayville

    "Too many bats in the belfry, eh?" The question came from a small man in the scrubs-and-robe garb of an inmate. He looked a little like a garden…

  • LJ-Idol

    Another batch of entries. Consistently amazed at how good the writing is. http://therealljidol.livejournal.com/557968.html Voting is open for…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    switch
    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
    Help
  • 0 comments