Tom Ramcigam (magicmarmot) wrote,
Tom Ramcigam

Just call me Mister Grumpy-Ass.

Impromptu meeting today on architecture. GUIman and I are having head-butting arguments over some really weird shit. When I mention that "blocks get parsed into objects", he first wants a rigid definition of the object, then objects to the parsing. When I'm explaining the block structure advantages over the existing cobbled-together randomness, he objects to it as being unnecessary.

It's absolutely weird. He wants to describe everything in terms of UML, where I feel that UML is too cumbersome for some of the embedded real-time concepts. When I talk about abstraction of the communication between two units in the sense of an ISO/OSI network abstraction, he calls it too complex and feels it would take too much time, instead being in favor of a "data virtualization" layer. Which is exactly the same thing.

It seems like he's just objecting to what I'm bringing up because it's me bringing it up. It's frustrating.
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.